Offshoring and increasing labour costsEvery country with cheap labour eventually gets richer - the labour costs increase and alas, we nomadically relocate to another country. Generally, the key benefit of offshoring is lower labour costs. In light of China’s fast-increasing labour prices, companies are faced with a dilemma - to stick to one’s guns and remain in China, potentially losing that attractive profit margin, or to shift one’s industry to another developing market. This article sums up some key stats and argues for staying in China. The key tenet of this proposition is that a Yuan revaluation is inevitable, leading to an appreciation in buying power. The domestic market in China will experience a surge. This, coupled with China’s increasing investment in inbound SMEs and a superb infrastructure are but a few of the pillars of a competitive multinational in China.
According to the IMF, China’s labour is now the third most expensive in emerging Asia, after Malaysia and Thailand. New labour laws arguably offer more job security to the detriment of employers and transport prices are rising with the cost of oil. All the while, there is the question of a Yuan revaluation and the resulting impact of an appreciation on the export Industry.
Boston Consulting Group listed a number of multinationals, which have already shifted production, including Caterpillar, Ford, Flextronics and toy manufacturers such as Wham-O. These have moved to other cheaper Asian countries or back to their home markets.
Tags: SMEs, Domestic demand, Foreign Direct Investment, Private Equity, Silk route, Infrastructure, services industry, yuan revaluation, price increase, labour
Sources of EnergyIn 2009, thermal energy was the country's primary source of electricity production, representing 80% of electricity generation, followed by hydro-power at 16%, nuclear power at 1.8% and other non-hydro renewables at 1.24%.
The 12th 5 year plan is ground-breaking in its emphasis on the importance of sustainable growth and using renewable sources of energy. Water consumption in industrial processes is to be cut by 30%. Non-fossil fuels are to account for 11.4 % of primary energy consumption. GDP CO2 emissions are to be cut by 17%. Forest coverage is to rise by 21.66%. Companies, such as Nalco, which sees the potential in this shift, is adamant to get involved and aims to grow in China by 20% in the next 5 years.
This new 5 year plan is by no means an eco-political tectonic shift. China treads a fine line between slowing growth and inflation. But, this plan marks the realisation that continued reliance upon foreign resources undermines its security. China’s heavy involvement in Africa, Afghanistan, Indonesia and South America belie an insatiable thirst for raw materials, from oil to rare earths, timber through to copper. This reliance upon foreign resources, particularly from areas of unrest, is not ideal. Coupled with the notion of defence is of course the problem of our environment. In a recent RUSI report (Royal United Services Institute), John Mabey remarked:
“Climate impacts will force us into a radical rethink of how we identify and secure our national interests. For example, our energy and climate security will increasingly depend on stronger alliances with other large energy consumers, such as China, to develop and deploy new energy technologies, and less on relations with oil producing states.”
Tags: Research & Development, R&D, Over capacity, China IPR, Non compete provisions, UHV, Suntech, China Defence, Infrastructure, 5 year plan, china investment, Wind Energy, Green Energy, Alternative Energy, Solar Energy